Geology & Geochemistry of Combustible Minerals No. 1 (178) 2019, 63-73.
Yulia LYSAK, Yuriy SHPOT, Andriy SHYRA, Zoriana KUCHER, Ihor KUROVETSInstitute of Geology and Geochemistry of Combustible Minerals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
The purpose of the work was to construct petrophysical models of reservoir rocks of different rank: typical and unified. Typical models describe connections between the parameters of individual rocks lithotypes occurring in definite geological conditions and serving as the basis for the development of petrophysical classification of reservoir rocks in the oil geology. The principle of unification provides for creation of the models structure for different reservoir lithotypes both in the geological section and in the area.
We have studied petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks of Carboniferous deposits in the central part of the Dnieper-Donets depression. Petrophysical properties of rocks in conditions close to the formational ones and relations between them were studied on a number of samples formed by the core samples of different age. Main geological factors that have an influence on reservoir properties of rocks were taken into consideration.
While constructing and analysing of petrophysical models we have used a probable-statistic approach with the use of the correlative-regressive analysis.
Result of the work is contained in typical petrophysical models for individual areas and in unified models obtained on consolidated samples for Lower Carboniferous deposits of this region. Characteristic features in variations of petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks of Carboniferous deposits and their models have been ascertained.
A conclusion has been made that multidimensional models, in which the depth of occurrence of deposits is one of the parameters that are necessary to consider while constructing petrophysical models, are the most informative for determination of petrophysical properties of the studied deposits, and the models obtained by us are known to be a petrophysical basis for quantitative interpretation of data from geophysical studies in the boreholes of the given region.
petrophysical models, Dnieper-Donets depression, catagenetic processes.
Atlas rodovyshch nafty i hazu Ukrainy. T. 1. Skhidnyi naftohazonosnyi rehion. (1998). Lviv: UHNA. [in Ukrainian]
Ellanskiy, M. M. (1978). Petrofizicheskiye svyazi i kompleksnaya interpretatsiya dannykh promyslovoy geofiziki. Moskva: Nedra. [in Russian]
Gurzhiy, D. V. et al. (1989). Litologiya i porody kollektory na bolshikh glubinakh v neftegazonosnykh provintsiyakh Ukrainy. Kiev: Naukova dumka. [in Russian]
Kabyshev, B. P. et al. (1989). Geologiya i neftegazonosnost Dneprovsko-Donetskoy vpadiny. Kiev: Naukova dumka. [in Russian]
Kurovets, I. M. (2001). Stan i problemy vyvchennia petrofizychnykh vlastyvostei porid-kolektoriv nafty i hazu. Heolohiia i heokhimiia horiuchykh kopalyn, 2, 136–147. [in Ukrainian]
Kurovets, I. M., & Prytulka, H. Y. (2001). Otsinka vplyvu heolohichnykh faktoriv na petrofizychni vlastyvosti teryhennykh kolektoriv. Heolohiia i heokhimiia horiuchykh kopalyn, 4, 81–92. [in Ukrainian]
Kurovets, I. M., Prytulka, H. Y., Zubko, O. S., & Sheremeta, O. V. (1999). Petrofizychna parametrychna osnova dlia pidrakhunku zapasiv hazu v sarmatskykh vidkladakh Bilche-Volytskoi zony Peredkarpatskoho prohynu. Heolohiia i heokhimiia horiuchykh kopalyn, 4, 15–24. [in Ukrainian]
Petkevich, G. I., Sheremeta, O. V., & Pritulka, G. I. (1979). Metodika petrofizicheskogo izucheniya kollektorov nefti i gaza v usloviyakh. modeliruyushchikh plastovyye. Kiev: Naukova dumka. [in Russian]